Porter v. Bank Line, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Rodriguez is entitled by statute to de novo review of the 18 subject. Under Raddatz [447 U.S. 667 (1980

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Waterman v. Aakre
  S.D. New York· 1939-12-29· cited 6×
• Huilever, S. A. v. the Otho
  S.D. New York· 1943-01-26· cited 4×
• Squillante & Zimmerman Sales, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Marine Management, Inc.
  D. Puerto Rico· 1981-06-11· cited 2×
• May v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt Aktien-Gesellschaft
  S.D. New York· 1931-10-27· cited 2×
• In re Southern Transp. Co.
  E.D. Virginia· 1935-03-14

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• The Turret Crown
  Second Circuit· 1924-01-10· cited 47×
• Hines v. Butler
  Fourth Circuit· 1921-11-01· cited 28×
• The Virginia
  D. Maryland· 1920-04-02· cited 21×
• United States v. Middleton
  Fourth Circuit· 1924-11-19· cited 10×
• The Elizabeth Dantzler
  E.D. Virginia· 1920-01-30· cited 10×
• The Moosabee
  E.D. Virginia· 1923-07-24· cited 3×