Skip to main content
· 11/4/1988

Wassink v. Hawkins

Citations

  • 763 P.2d 971
  • 1988 Alas. LEXIS 149
  • 1988 WL 119700

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • failure to show factual dispute on third prong fatal to appeal from summary dismissal of economic duress argument
  • failure to show factual dispute on third prong fatal to appeal from summary dismissal of economic duress argument
  • failure to show factual dispute on third prong fatal to appeal from summary judgment on economic duress argument
  • \Estoppel may be invoked as a defense against the government. ...\
  • \Estoppel may be invoked as a defense against the government....\
  • “Normally agreements between private parties are upheld and enforced by courts. However, authorities hold that an agreement exempting a party from liability for future willful or negligent conduct should not be enforced where the interest of the public is involved.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matthews, Witz, Burke, Compton, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.