Burgess Construction Co. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding anticipated costs of obtaining insurance to cover indemnification included as part of bid on project
• “Any ambiguity in an objectionable adhesive term will be seized upon and construed most strictly against the drafter.”
• contractor’s employees killed on public highway; indemnification clause held valid, since the state's incentive to maintain public roads would not be diminished by an indemnity clause with one contractor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).