Washpon v. Parr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying summary judgment where plaintiff received tetanus shot at hospital following removal of handcuffs and testified to having permanent scarring
• denying summary judgment where plaintiff required medical treatment following handcuffing and alleged permanent injury in the form of scars
• dismissing the plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim where the plaintiff admittedly refused to pass through the court's security and refused to comply with the officers' directives that she leave the building, which ultimately led to the plaintiff's arrest
• “[U]se of restraints in such a way as to cause permanent injury or scarring may support an excessive force claim.”’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).