Skip to main content

Washoe County v. Otto

Citations

  • 128 Nev. 424
  • 282 P.3d 719
  • 128 Nev. Adv. Rep. 40
  • 2012 WL 3241353
  • 2012 Nev. LEXIS 82

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[t]he absence of discretionary language in [the statute], by contrast, is significant” to court determination that requirement, is jurisdictional
  • applying de novo review to questions involving statutory construction and jurisdictional issues
  • this court may affirm the district court if it reached the proper result, albeit on alternative grounds
  • reviewing de novo whether a statutory provision required dismissal
  • \The word 'must' generally imposes a mandatory requirement.\
  • \The word 'must' generally imposes a mandatory requirement.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cherry, Douglas, Gibbons, Hardesty, Parraguirre, Saitta

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.