Harris Associates v. Clark County School District

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a statute's language \`should not be read to produce absurd or unreasonable results'\ (quoting Glover v. Concerned Citizens for Fuji Park, 118 Nev. 488, 492, 50 P.3d 546, 548 (2002
• holding that statutes are construed in a way that \give[s] meaning to all of their parts and language ... within the context of the purpose of the legislation\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• recognizing that a statute’s language “ ‘should not be read to produce absurd or unreasonable results’ ” (quoting Glover v. Concerned Citizens for Fuji Park, 118 Nev 488, 492, 50 P.3d 546, 548 (2002
• holding that statutes are construed in a way that \give [s] meaning to all of their parts and language. . . within the context of the purpose of the legislation\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that statutes are construed in a way that \give [s] meaning to all of their parts and language. . . within the context of the purpose of the legislation\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• noting that the interpretation of a statute’s language should not produce unreasonable or absurd results

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).