Skip to main content

Washington v. State

Citations

  • 106 So. 3d 441
  • 2011 WL 1449032
  • 2011 Ala. LEXIS 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • expressly refusing to hold that 'the adequacy of the presentence report should be evaluated in isolation'

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bolin, Cobb, Main, Murdock, Parker, Shaw, Stuart, Themselves, Wise, Woodall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.