Ex Parte Trawick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that without more, the mere fact that the prosecutor used a high number of strikes to remove women from the venire is insufficient to establish a prima facie case
• holding that without more, the mere fact that the prosecutor used a high number of strikes to remove women from the venire is insufficient to establish a prima facie case
• holding that the State’s “use[ ] [of] 11 of its 14 peremptory strikes to remove women from Trawiek’s jury, resulting in a petit jury that was composed of 7 men and 5 women’-’ -did not raise an inference that the State discriminated' against women
• considering, among other factors, the manner in which a party questions potential jurors and disparate treatment during voir dire, as evidence of discriminatory intent
• there is no reversible error when the trial court follows the pattern jury instructions adopted by the Alabama Supreme Court
• relevant factors to establish a prima facie case under Batson [v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986),] apply to claims of gender discrimination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).