Washington v. Oregon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• considering whether the record demonstrated that the defendant posed a security concern where the defendant was required to wear a “stun belt” under his clothing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Espinoza v. Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2016-04-14· cited 73×
• State v. Guzek
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2015-11-27· cited 19×
• Heroff v. Coursey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-08-10· cited 18×
• State v. Bray
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-12· cited 15×
• Sproule v. Coursey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-10· cited 14×
• State v. Anderson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-11-02· cited 11×
• State v. Riley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2019-05-31· cited 6×
• State v. Avila
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-29· cited 6×
• State v. Valdez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-21· cited 3×
• Clark v. Nooth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-04-12· cited 3×
• State v. Carrasco-Montiel
  Washington County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-22· cited 2×
• State v. McCright
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-07· cited 1×