Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 12/18/2002

In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction Cases

Citations

  • 2002 Ohio 6720
  • 97 Ohio St. 3d 465

Syllabus

Civil procedure—Class actions—Civ.R. 23(B)(3), applied—Trial court did not act unreasonably, arbitrarily, or unconscionably in certifying a class action in cases brought by mortgagors against their respective lenders for alleged violations of R.C. 5301.36.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Clearly the claims brought by each plaintiff invoke a common question of law; whether a particular lender violated its duty to record a satisfaction of mortgage.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named In re Consol. Mtge. Satisfaction Cases

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.