Warner v. Warner
Citations
- 100 Cal. 11
- 34 P. 523
- 1893 Cal. LEXIS 741
Syllabus
<p>Divorce—Place of Commencement of Action—Change of Place of Trial—Residence of Defendant—Construction of Code.—Section 128 of the Civil Code, which provides that an action for divorce must be brought in the county of the plaintiff’s residence, must be read in connection with sections 395 and 397 of the Code of Civil Procedure, and is a mere limitation as to the place for the commencement of the action, and is not inconsistent with the latter sections, which provide for the change of place of trial of actions; and a defendant in such action has the right to a change of place of trial to the county in which he resides, upon proper demand therefor.</p> <p>Id.—Joinder of Real and Personal Actions—Divorce and Division of Community Property—Joint Demand for Change of Venue.— Where real and personal actions are joined in the same complaint the action must be tried in the county of the defendant’s residence; and an action by a wife for a divorce, which also seeks a division of the community property, and to set aside a fraudulent conveyance of such property by the husband to a codefendant, may be removed to the county of the husband’s residence, if the grantee in the alleged fraudulent conveyance joins the husband in the demand therefor.</p>
Judges: Beatty, Harrison, Paterson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Elms v. ElmsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1935-12-04· cited 44×
- Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-06-09· cited 37×
- Turlock Theatre Co. v. LawsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1939-01-12· cited 36×
- Duffy v. DuffyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-12-03· cited 18×
- Juneau v. JuneauCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-05-22· cited 12×
- In Re Marriage of DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-03-22· cited 12×
- Keithly v. LaceyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-12-19· cited 7×
- Usher v. UsherCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-03-07· cited 5×
- Henson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1963-07-15· cited 4×
- Duffill v. BartlettNevada Supreme Court· 1931-03-30· cited 4×
- Erickson v. BohneCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1953-10-13· cited 3×
- All-Cool Aluminum Awning Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-02-14· cited 3×
- Hockett v. HockettSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1914-11-30· cited 3×
- Cochrane v. McDonaldCalifornia Superior Court, San Francisco County· 1894-07-09
- Bithorn v. BallSupreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1911-05-08
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court· 1891-04-02· cited 76×
- Fong v. SternesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-04-23· cited 57×
- LeBreton v. Superior Court of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court· 1884-10-10· cited 29×
- O'Neil v. O'NeilCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 15×
- Estrada v. OreñaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 11×
- Byrne v. ByrneCalifornia Supreme Court· 1881-07-01· cited 8×
- Hancock v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1882-07-19· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.