Smith v. Smith
Citations
- 88 Cal. 572
- 26 P. 356
- 1891 Cal. LEXIS 735
Syllabus
<p>Venue of Action — Declaring Deed a Mortgage — Reconveyance of Real and Personal Property — Accounting — Residence of Defendant — Change of Place of Trial. — An action to declare a conveyance, absolute upon its face, a mortgage, to compel a reconveyance of the real and personal property included therein, and for an accounting and personal judgment thereon, must be tried in the county in which the defendant resides, and he is entitled to have the place of trial changed to such county, although a portion of the property sought to be reconveyed, and in respect to which the accounting is sought, is land situated in the county in which the suit was brought.</p> <p>Id. —Joinder of Real and Personal Actions — Construction of Code. — An action must be wholly local in its nature, under the terms of section 392 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to entitle it to be tried in a county other than that of the residence of the defendant; and if real and personal actions are joined in the same complaint, the case falls within section 395 of the same code, and must be tried in the county of the residence of the defendant.</p> <p>Id. — Accounting—Equity—Personal Action.—An action for an accounting is a proceeding in equity, and is essentially a personal action.</p>
Judges: Harrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court· 1895-02-01· cited 72×
- Neet v. HolmesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-02-26· cited 47×
- Goossen v. CliftonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-06-20· cited 39×
- Warner v. WarnerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1893-10-10· cited 38×
- Vaughan v. RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-06-09· cited 37×
- Turlock Theatre Co. v. LawsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1939-01-12· cited 36×
- Myers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-09-05· cited 33×
- Griffin & Skelly Co. v. Magnolia & Healdsburg Fruit Cannery Co.California Supreme Court· 1895-05-31· cited 27×
- Hise v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1943-02-19· cited 25×
- Postin v. GriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1944-10-04· cited 22×
- Hays v. CowlesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1943-09-22· cited 17×
- Bybee v. FairchildCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1946-06-20· cited 16×
- Eldee-K Rental Properties, LLC v. Directv, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2014-04-09· cited 12×
- Peninsular Trading & Fishing Co. v. Pacific Steam Whaling Co.California Supreme Court· 1899-03-08· cited 12×
- Beutke v. American Securities Co.California Court of Appeal· 1955-04-18· cited 11×
- Channell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1964-04-09· cited 11×
- Gilman v. NordinCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1952-08-22· cited 10×
- Vickerson v. WehrCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1941-01-29· cited 9×
- Stesel v. Santa Ana River Water Co.California Court of Appeal· 1939-10-11· cited 8×
- Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1962-05-04· cited 8×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.