Skip to main content

Warner v. State

Citations

  • 969 S.W.2d 1
  • 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 58
  • 1998 WL 205781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an offer of proof may be in question‑and‑answer form, or it may be in the form of a concise statement by counsel
  • stating that offer of proof must show that excluded evidence is relevant and admissible
  • to preserve error, an offer of proof, “must include a reasonably specific summary of the evidence offered”
  • offer of proof may be made by question and answer or concise statement of counsel
  • “[W]e have held that a ruling on a State’s motion in limine that excludes defense evidence is subject to reconsideration throughout trial and that to preserve error an offer of the evidence must be made at trial.”
  • offer of proof may be in form of concise statement by counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

163 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.