Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 10/30/1989

Warmack v. United States

Citations

  • 493 U.S. 942
  • 110 S. Ct. 343
  • 107 L. Ed. 2d 332
  • 58 U.S.L.W. 3289
  • 1989 U.S. LEXIS 5101

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • habeas court must defer to state court’s interpretation of state law unless interpretation is “untenable or amounts to a subterfuge to avoid federal review of a constitutional violation”; citation omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases named Warmack v. United States

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.