Supreme Court· 12/9/2014

Warger v. Shauers

Citations

135 S. Ct. 521
190 L. Ed. 2d 422
2014 U.S. LEXIS 8294
25 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 9

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a juror’s dishonesty during voir dire is internal to the deliberative process and not admissible to impeach a verdict
holding that a juror’s dishonesty during voir dire is internal to the deliberative process and not admissible to impeach a verdict
holding that a juror’s dishonesty during voir dire is internal to the deliberative process and not admissible to impeach a verdict
holding that a juror’s dishonesty during voir dire is internal to the deliberative process and not admissible to impeach a verdict
holding that “Rule 606(b) precludes a party seeking a new trial from using one juror’s affidavit of what another juror said in deliberations to demonstrate the other juror’s dishonesty during voir dire”
holding that Federal Rule 606 (b)’s preclusion applies to claims for a new trial made on the ground that a juror lied during voir dire and prohibits the use of evidence of deliberations to show dishonesty during voir dire

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Warger v. Shauers

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.