Skip to main content

Ward v. State

Citations

  • 59 So. 3d 1220
  • 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 6325
  • 2011 WL 1661109

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that § 316.1935 does not require “the state to prove the validity of or show the reason for the original pursuit”
  • recognizing rule that evidence is inextricably intertwined if it is necessary to adequately describe the deed
  • finding that extensive testimony and evidence about a shooting that preceded a police chase that resulted in the sole charge of fleeing or eluding a police officer was not inextricably intertwined
  • “Evidence is ‘inextricably intertwined’ if it is necessary to (1) adequately describe the deed; (2) provide an intelligent account of the crime(s) charged; (3) establish the entire context out of which the charged crime(s) arose; or (4
  • “Evidence is ‘inextricably intertwined’ if it is necessary to (1) adequately describe the deed; (2) provide an intelligent account of the crime(s) charged; (3) establish the entire context out of which the charged crime(s) arose; or (4

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ciklin, Levine, Polen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.