Skip to main content

Ward v. State

Citations

  • 414 A.2d 499
  • 1980 Del. LEXIS 377

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendant’s claim that habitual offender statute was arbitrarily and capriciously applied to him in absence of showing that selection of defendant was based on impermissible classification rather than prosecutorial discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McNeilly, Quillen and Horsey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.