Wandler v. Lewis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding defendant’s repeated acquiescence to previous nonconsensual assignments, and his continued acceptance of payments from the assignee after he was aware of the assignment, evidenced “the nonassignment provision was generally not enforced”
• holding defendant's repeated acquiescence to previous nonconsensual assignments, and his continued acceptance of payments from the assignee after he was aware of the assignment, evidenced \the nonassignment provision was generally not enforced\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Harter v. Plains Ins. Co., Inc.
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-06-10· cited 36×
• Bozied v. City of Brookings
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-12-26· cited 21×
• Alma Group, L.L.C. v. Weiss
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-08-16· cited 7×
• Johnson v. Light
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2006-10-04· cited 4×
• Brown v. Powell
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2002-06-26· cited 3×
• Alma Group
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 2000-08-16

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• American State Bank v. Adkins
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1990-07-18· cited 56×
• Nielsen v. McCabe
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-06-28· cited 33×
• Maganas v. Northroup
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1983-05-04· cited 29×
• Higgins v. Kittleson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1965-05-05· cited 26×
• Beitelspacher v. Winther
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1989-10-18· cited 26×
• Kane v. Schnitzler
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-10-30· cited 24×
• BankWest, N.A. v. Groseclose
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-08-02· cited 24×
• Kirby v. Palos Verdes Escrow Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1986-07-01· cited 24×
• Smith v. Martin
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1919-11-12· cited 23×
• Southern Cross Lumber & Millwork Co. v. Becker
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1988-11-29· cited 22×
• Ford v. Hofer
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1961-10-19· cited 21×
• Cowan v. Mervin Mewes, Inc.
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1996-04-17· cited 20×
• Paul v. Chromalytics Corporation
  Superior Court of Delaware· 1975-07-22· cited 20×
• Freegard v. First Western National Bank
  Utah Supreme Court· 1987-05-12· cited 19×
• Heikkila v. Carver
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-11-13· cited 18×
• Barnes v. Clement
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1899-12-20· cited 18×
• Prentice v. Classen
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-09-26· cited 17×
• Wagner v. Cheney
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1884-07-15· cited 16×
• Peterson v. Beck
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1995-09-06· cited 15×
• City of Winner v. Bechtold Investments, Inc.
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1992-07-01· cited 15×