Paul v. Chromalytics Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that courts have \invariably\ upheld clauses like one stating that an assignment of an agreement or rights thereunder without consent \shall be void\
• holding assignment of right to receive payment on promissory notes void under anti-assignment provision
• rejecting an argument that a party waived its right to object to an assignment noting the lack of clear proof of the purpose to waive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).