Wampler v. Sherwood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the actual requirements of the relevant law do not control where the instruction approved by both parties fails to include one of the requirements
• motion for JNOV cannot be based on grounds not raised by motion for directed verdict
• motion for JNOV cannot be based on grounds not raised by motion for directed verdict

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Olsen v. Deschutes County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-01-25· cited 33×
• Kennedy v. Wheeler
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2014-12-11· cited 17×
• State Ex Rel. Harmon v. Blanding
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1982-03-30· cited 15×
• Ross v. DeLorenzo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1983-11-23· cited 11×
• Sila v. Saunders
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2008-01-11· cited 7×
• Schoonover v. Klamath County
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-02-13· cited 5×
• Mays v. Vejo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-12-10· cited 4×
• State v. Evilsizer
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-09· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Fulton Insurance Co. v. White Motor Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1972-02-02· cited 108×
• Nesbitt v. Flaccus
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1964-11-17· cited 45×
• Cronn v. Fisher
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1966-12-30· cited 44×
• Vancil v. Poulson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1964-01-22· cited 26×
• Tarrell v. Erdmann
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1974-08-28· cited 11×
• Harris Et Ux v. Backus
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1958-02-11· cited 6×