Walz v. Walz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the trial court's finding that there had been a meeting of the minds must be supported by competent substantial evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Healey v. Healey
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-07-13· cited 4×
• Matos v. Matos
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-01· cited 1×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Williams v. Ingram
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-28· cited 43×
• Dorson v. Dorson
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-02-11· cited 39×
• Roskind v. Roskind
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-11-07· cited 15×
• Silva v. Silva
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-04-23· cited 12×
• Loss v. Loss
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-10-28· cited 11×
• Mortgage Corp. of America v. INLAND CONST.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-01-22· cited 4×
• Cohen v. Cohen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-12-01· cited 4×