Skip to main content
· 11/7/1989

Roskind v. Roskind

Citations

  • 552 So. 2d 1155
  • 1989 WL 133294

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[a] stipulation properly entered into the record, where there is a clear understanding of the finality of that agreement, is an effective and enforceable settlement notwithstanding that it is subject to reduction to a written document”
  • enforcing oral settlement stipulation entered into the record, to which wife affirmed her understanding and unequivocally agreed
  • upholding an oral settlement agreement where the wife was specifically asked whether she “had an opportunity to speak to your attorneys regarding this [agreement]”
  • “A stipulation properly entered into the record, where there is a clear understanding of the finality of that agreement, is an effective and enforceable settlement notwithstanding that it is subject to reduction to a written document.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baskin, Ferguson and Cope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.