Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Michigan Supreme Court· 4/14/2004

Waltz v. Wyse

Citations

  • 677 N.W.2d 813
  • 469 Mich. 642

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • MCL 600.5852, the wrongful death saving provision, is not a statute of limitations because it applies “although the period of limitations has run.”
  • “Under this provision, the limitation period is tolled for 182 days if the plaintiff provides a valid notice of intent before the limitation period expires.”
  • the notice tolling provision does not toll the wrongful death saving provision, MCL 600.5852
  • the notice tolling provision does not toll the wrongful death saving provision, MCL 600.5852
  • citations omitted; alteration in original.] III. ANALYSIS The period of limitations for medical malpractice actions is controlled by statute. Miller v Mercy Mem Hosp Corp, 466 Mich 196, 199; 644 NW2d 730 (2002
  • citations omitted; alteration in original.] III. ANALYSIS The period of limitations for medical malpractice actions is controlled by statute. Miller v Mercy Mem Hosp Corp, 466 Mich 196, 199; 644 NW2d 730 (2002

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corrigan, Weaver, Taylor, Markman, Young, Kelly, Cavanagh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

70 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.