Neal v. Oakwood Hospital Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a 182-day medical malpractice notice requirement did not violate separation of powers
• holding that a 182-day medical malpractice notice requirement did not violate separation of powers
• “[t]he purpose of the notice requirement is to promote settlement without the need for formal litigation”
• “[Dismissal without prejudice” would be the “appropriate sanction for plaintiffs noncompliance with [MCL 600.2912b(l)]”
• “[D]ismissal without prejudice” would be the “appropriate sanction for plaintiffs noncompliance with [MCL 600.2912b(l)]”
• “[Dismissal without prejudice” would be the “appropriate sanction for plaintiffs noncompliance with [MCL 600.2912b(l)]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).