Walton v. Walton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that Australia was the only “legally justifiable” option among three locations
• court ruled on merits of petition thirty days after petition was filed
• “On April 15, 1996, [Petitioner] filed the subject petition in this Court and a Writ of Habeas Corpus was issued that day requiring [Respondent] to appear before this Court on May 13, 1996, to show cause why [the child] should not be returned to Australia.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re: The Application Of, Arnon Mozes v. Michal Mozes
  Ninth Circuit· 2001-01-09· cited 276×
• Zajaczkowski v. Zajaczkowska
  D. Maryland· 1996-07-26· cited 10×
• Menachem v. Frydman-Menachem
  D. Maryland· 2003-01-14· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Edward M. Feder v. Melissa Ann Evans-Feder
  Third Circuit· 1995-08-24· cited 250×
• Emanuel Friedrich v. Jeana Michele Friedrich David Harper and Shirley Harper
  Sixth Circuit· 1993-01-22· cited 212×
• Application of Ponath
  D. Utah· 1993-08-17· cited 47×