Walters v. Servidio
Citations
- 227 Conn. App. 1
Syllabus
The plaintiffs and the defendants owned real property on Road A, which intersects with Road B in two locations. The northern intersection was north of the defendants' properties and south of the plaintiffs' properties and was known as the ''Y right of way.'' The only access to the southern intersection was obtained by traveling over an area between the defen- dants' properties (disputed area), which was rocky, wooded, and unpaved. The Y right of way, which provided the plaintiffs with access to Road B, was much closer to the plaintiffs' properties than the southern intersection. In 1908, before the Y right of way existed, the original subdivision map for the area was recorded on the land records. In 1958, the northern part of the subdivision was resubdivided into larger lots, some of which would later become the plaintiffs' properties, and the resubdivision map recorded on the land records shows the Y right of way. When the defendants purchased their property on Road A, the paving in front of their house that ran from the northern part of the disputed area to the Y right of way was not a road but a driveway nine feet in width, and there was no paving or other physical manifestation of a road in the disputed area. Since the defendants purchased the property on Road A in 1987, with the exception of a short period of time during a sewer project in late 2003 and early 2004, during which time the defendants granted to the town of Greenwich an easement for sewer installation, the disputed area had not been passable to traffic and the defendants had not observed anyone travel through the disputed area for any purpose, including to access the southern intersection. The plaintiffs filed on the town's land records affidavits of fact against the defendants' properties on Road A and Road B that falsely claimed an easement over the disputed area. The plaintiffs thereafter commenced the present action, seeking, inter alia, a declaratory judgment that they had an express or implie
Judges: Moll; Westbrook; Flynn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cardona v. PadillaConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-02-04· cited 2×
- Camozzi v. PierceConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-02-11· cited 1×
- State ex rel. Dunn v. BurtonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2024-11-26
- Metroplitan District v. MottConnecticut Appellate Court· 2025-09-30
- Esposito v. RabinConnecticut Appellate Court· 2026-06-16
Cites
20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-03-16· cited 817×
- Pestey v. CushmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-02-05· cited 113×
- Batte-Holmgren v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-02-13· cited 68×
- City of Bristol v. Tilcon Minerals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-09-25· cited 56×
- Il Giardino, LLC v. Belle Haven Land Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-09-05· cited 52×
- Coughlin v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-08-10· cited 36×
- McCullough v. Waterfront Park Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court· 1993-08-31· cited 31×
- Centimark Corp. v. Village Manor Associates Ltd. PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-04-07· cited 29×
- McBurney v. CirilloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-01-24· cited 29×
- New York Coastal Partnership, Inc. v. Department of the InteriorSupreme Court· 2005-10-03· cited 23×
- McCullough v. Waterfront Park Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-10-15· cited 20×
- Fountain Pointe, LLC v. CalpitanoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-08-06· cited 20×
- Stefanoni v. DuncanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-06-19· cited 18×
- Schultz v. BarkerConnecticut Appellate Court· 1988-08-30· cited 18×
- Schwartz v. MurphyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-12-24· cited 17×
- In re Jacob W.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2017-11-16· cited 12×
- CACIOPOLI v. LebowitzConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-09-06· cited 11×
- Firstlight Hydro Generating Co. v. StewartSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2018-05-01· cited 11×
- Utay v. G.C.S. Realty, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-10-01· cited 6×
- Martin Drive Corp. v. ThorsenConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-11-13· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.