Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/10/2004
Coughlin v. Anderson
Citations
- 270 Conn. 487
- 853 A.2d 460
- 2004 Conn. LEXIS 311
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘‘[i]t is axiom- atic that the burden of proving damages is on the party claiming them’’ (internal quotation marks omitted)
- “[although it is the jury’s right to draw logical deductions and make reasonable inferences from the facts proven ... it may not resort to mere conjecture and speculation” [internal quotation marks omitted]
- \[a]lthough it is the jury's right to draw logical deductions and make reasonable inferences from the facts proven . . . it may not resort to mere conjecture and speculation\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
- ‘‘[a]s a general rule, facts must be pleaded as a special defense when they are consistent with the allegations of the complaint but demonstrate, nonethe- less, that the plaintiff has no cause of action’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]
- ‘‘[a]s a general rule, facts must be pleaded as a special defense when they are consistent with the allegations of the complaint but demonstrate, nonethe- less, that the plaintiff has no cause of action’’ [internal quotation marks omitted]
- “It is axiomatic that the burden of proving damages is on the party claiming them. . . . When damages are claimed they are an essential element of the plaintiffs proof and must be proved with reasonable certainty.” [Internal quotation marks omitted.]
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Norcott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-05-01· cited 78×
- Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-06-16· cited 54×
- McBurney v. CirilloSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-01-24· cited 29×
- National Publishing Co. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-07-08· cited 22×
- Chijian Zhang v. Omnipoint Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-02-01· cited 22×
- Burton v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-06-09· cited 20×
- Riccio v. HARBOUR VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM ASS'NSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2007-02-06· cited 20×
- Robinson v. GailnoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-09-06· cited 14×
- Almada v. Wausau Business InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-07-12· cited 14×
- Keeney v. Mystic Valley Hunt Club, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2006-01-31· cited 13×
- Simone v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-08-30· cited 12×
- Sargent v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-02-08· cited 9×
- Stefanoni v. DuncanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-11-01· cited 8×
- Sullivan v. Metro-North Commuter RailroadConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-08-01· cited 7×
- U. B. Vehicle Leasing, Inc. v. DavisConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-07-12· cited 6×
- Moran v. MorneauConnecticut Appellate Court· 2007-03-27· cited 6×
- Chorches v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.D. Connecticut· 2014-09-10· cited 6×
- Dept. of Public Health v. EstradaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2024-06-11· cited 6×
- Johnson v. SourignamathConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-07-26· cited 5×
- Walters v. ServidioConnecticut Appellate Court· 2024-07-30· cited 5×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Bennett v. Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-16· cited 99×
- Pawlinski v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1973-05-02· cited 93×
- DuBose v. CarabettaSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1971-06-03· cited 83×
- State v. WargoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-12-19· cited 69×
- Branch v. OcchioneroSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-20· cited 56×
- Il Giardino, LLC v. Belle Haven Land Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-09-05· cited 52×
- Frillici v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-10· cited 46×
- Schulz v. SyvertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1991-05-28· cited 40×
- River Bend Associates, Inc. v. Conservation & Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-05-18· cited 40×
- Janusauskas v. FichmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-07-22· cited 39×
- Lakeview Associates v. Woodlake Master Condominium Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-01-21· cited 26×
- Town of Boothbay v. JennessSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 2003-05-05· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.