· 7/15/1986
Naulty v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 346 S.E.2d 540
- 2 Va. App. 523
- 3 Va. Law Rep. 65
- 1986 Va. App. LEXIS 302
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no prejudice because defendant did not “allege any specific prejudice suffered as a result of the tape’s admission, nor is any prejudice apparent from the record”
- affirming trial court’s finding that “no plea agreement had ever been reached” where the evidence established that the defendant rejected the Commonwealth’s offer and then later tried to accept it
- affirming trial court's finding that \no plea agreement had ever been reached\ where the evidence established that the defendant rejected the Commonwealth's offer and then later tried to accept it
- videotape of defendant purchasing chemicals used in the manufacture of PCP admitted into evidence
- videotape of defendant purchasing chemicals used in the manufacture of PCP admitted into evidence
- “A factual finding made by the trial court is binding on appeal unless plainly wrong”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keenan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.