District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/3/1994
Walsingham v. State
Citations
- 637 So. 2d 963
- 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 5273
- 1994 WL 236171
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Although defendant was resen-tenced on remand after original sentence was reversed, subsequent supreme court decision in another case rendered defendant’s original sentence “legal”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Frank, Hall, Ryder
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- Burdick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-02-06· cited 189×
- Wemett v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-08-30· cited 46×
- Royal v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-10-29· cited 20×
- Walsingham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-07-23· cited 8×
- Walsingham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-03-06· cited 6×
- Walsingham v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-12-27· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.