Royal v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Rule 3.800 violated by increase of sentence on the day following conclusion of sentencing hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Farber v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-01-12· cited 30×
• Hinton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-02-03· cited 29×
• Cherry v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-10-26· cited 19×
• Dailey v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-06· cited 19×
• Ruffin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-11-14· cited 12×
• King v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-15· cited 10×
• Gilmore v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-04-22· cited 9×
• Johnson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-19· cited 7×
• Regueiro v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-06-09· cited 6×
• Scott v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-10-05· cited 3×
• Hopping v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-06-04· cited 3×
• Colvin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-10· cited 2×
• Cross v. Navarro
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-28· cited 2×
• Gallup v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-02-28· cited 2×
• Del Rio v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-03· cited 1×
• McCoy v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-19· cited 1×
• Walsingham v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-06-03· cited 1×
• Merriman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-04-17· cited 1×
• Ruffin v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-07