Skip to main content

Walsh v. State

Citations

  • 689 A.2d 131
  • 147 N.J. 595
  • 1997 N.J. LEXIS 71

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming determination that implied-eontract doctrine should not apply to public employee’s action in view of at-will relationship created by statute
  • affirming determination that implied-contract doctrine should not apply to public employee's action in view of at-will relationship created by statute
  • affirming on basis of Appellate Division dissenting opinion that contract implied in fact is not enforceable because beyond legal authority of State official making promise
  • affirming on basis of Appellate Division dissenting opinion that contract implied, in fact is not enforceable because beyond legal authority of State official making promise
  • action by a public defender seeking specific performance of an agreement to promote him
  • adopting Judge Skillman’s dissent as the opinion of the Court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.