Waller v. Hewlett-Packard Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[D]iscovery should be relevant where there is any possibility that the information sought may be relevant to the subject matter of the action.”
• “[D]iscovery should be relevant where there is any possibility that the information sought may be relevant to the subject matter of the action.”
• which case also involved subpoenas duces tecum served by plaintiff therein upon non-parties to the proceeding requiring the production of documents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).