N.D. California· 8/4/2015
Moore v. Apple Inc.
Citations
- 309 F.R.D. 532
- 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102849
- 2015 WL 4638293
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- denying class certification, because the proposed class members had materially different contracts that would require the court to devote substantially more time resolving individual contracts’ meaning
- denying 24 certification of a class that included individuals who, based on the class definition, “could 25 not have been injured by Defendant’s allegedly wrongful conduct”
- declining to require plaintiffs 2 to “propose [a] way to identify class members and [] prove that an administratively 3 feasible method exists [to do so]” at the class certification stage
- “The inclusion of class members whom, by definition, could not have been injured is . . . indicative of the individualized inquiries that would be necessary to determine whether a class member has suffered any injury in the first place.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Koh
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cindy Castillo v. Bank of America, NaNinth Circuit· 2020-11-18· cited 76×
- Daye v. Community Financial Service Centers, LLCD. New Mexico· 2016-02-09· cited 8×
- Natural Res. Def. Council v. ZinkeE.D. California· 2018-09-28· cited 7×
- In re Facebook Privacy LitigationN.D. California· 2016-06-28· cited 6×
- Gomez v. TrumpDistrict of Columbia· 2020-06-23
Cites
44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court· 2011-06-20· cited 4,653×
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court· 2009-03-03· cited 2,335×
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court· 2013-03-27· cited 1,534×
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court· 2013-02-27· cited 1,424×
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Ninth Circuit· 1998-06-09· cited 1,381×
- Monsanto Co. v. Geertson Seed FarmsSupreme Court· 2010-06-21· cited 922×
- Messner v. Northshore University HealthSystemSeventh Circuit· 2012-01-13· cited 591×
- Quelimane Co. v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court· 1998-09-23· cited 514×
- Mazza v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2012-01-12· cited 510×
- Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2007-12-28· cited 486×
- Denney v. Deutsche Bank AGSecond Circuit· 2006-03-31· cited 452×
- Marcus v. BMW of North America, LLCThird Circuit· 2012-08-07· cited 438×
- Armstrong v. DavisNinth Circuit· 2001-11-28· cited 428×
- Gina Glazer v. Whirlpool CorporationSixth Circuit· 2013-07-18· cited 325×
- Wolin v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLCNinth Circuit· 2010-08-17· cited 285×
- In Re New Motor Vehicles Can. Export Anti. Lit.First Circuit· 2008-03-28· cited 236×
- Kohen v. Pacific Investment Management Co.Seventh Circuit· 2009-07-07· cited 231×
- Larry Butler v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanySeventh Circuit· 2013-08-22· cited 183×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.