Skip to main content
N.D. California· 8/4/2015

Moore v. Apple Inc.

Citations

  • 309 F.R.D. 532
  • 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102849
  • 2015 WL 4638293

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying class certification, because the proposed class members had materially different contracts that would require the court to devote substantially more time resolving individual contracts’ meaning
  • denying 24 certification of a class that included individuals who, based on the class definition, “could 25 not have been injured by Defendant’s allegedly wrongful conduct”
  • declining to require plaintiffs 2 to “propose [a] way to identify class members and [] prove that an administratively 3 feasible method exists [to do so]” at the class certification stage
  • “The inclusion of class members whom, by definition, could not have been injured is . . . indicative of the individualized inquiries that would be necessary to determine whether a class member has suffered any injury in the first place.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koh

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.