Walker v. Valor Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “legal conclusions may not be admitted or included in a Rule 216 request”
• \Rule 216 applies only to the admission of facts\
• “Rule 216 applies only to the admission of facts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Robertson v. Sky Chefs, Inc.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-10-17· cited 15×
• Robbins v. Allstate Insurance
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-11-09· cited 9×
• Robbins v. Allstate
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-11-09

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Espinoza v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1995-03-30· cited 413×
• P.R.S. International, Inc. v. Shred Pax Corp.
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-10-22· cited 78×
• McCullough v. Gallaher & Speck
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-09-29· cited 53×
• Ruane v. Amore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-03-14· cited 42×
• Morris v. Auto-Owners Insurance
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-01-21· cited 19×