Skip to main content

Euceda v. United States

Citations

  • 66 A.3d 994
  • 2013 WL 2350212
  • 2013 D.C. App. LEXIS 279

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that error cannot be plain where neither this court nor the Supreme Court has decided the issue, and other courts are split on the issue
  • finding record sufficient to identify specific error alleged and review that error when record included a question signed by the foreperson and time-stamped received by the court
  • “Rule 43(a) ‘incorporates the protections afforded by the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause, the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause, and the common law right of presence.’”
  • error for clerk to answer jury note inquiring about the elements of an offense
  • assessing the cumulative effect of unobjected-to errors

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Beckwith, Blackburne, Rigsby, Thompson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.