District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 5/30/2013
Euceda v. United States
Citations
- 66 A.3d 994
- 2013 WL 2350212
- 2013 D.C. App. LEXIS 279
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that error cannot be plain where neither this court nor the Supreme Court has decided the issue, and other courts are split on the issue
- finding record sufficient to identify specific error alleged and review that error when record included a question signed by the foreperson and time-stamped received by the court
- “Rule 43(a) ‘incorporates the protections afforded by the Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause, the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause, and the common law right of presence.’”
- error for clerk to answer jury note inquiring about the elements of an offense
- assessing the cumulative effect of unobjected-to errors
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beckwith, Blackburne, Rigsby, Thompson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
14 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Harrell E. Hagans, Brion X. Arrington, Warren N. Allen and Gary A. Leaks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-06-05· cited 22×
- Tuckson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-10-03· cited 22×
- Jeremiah Gray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2013-11-07· cited 16×
- Tawanda Sheffield, Steven D. Lewis, and Allen Butler v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-03-12· cited 11×
- MARLON WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-01-21· cited 9×
- Ellswsorth Colbert v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2015-10-22· cited 6×
- Roberts v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2019-08-08· cited 5×
- Charles A. Grant v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2014-02-20· cited 4×
- Darren Cheeks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2017-09-07
- Burn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2020-08-20
- Parker & Jenkins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-04-22
- Geter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2023-12-21
- Robin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-10-16
- State v. Alvarado-MerazSupreme Court of Kansas· 2025-08-01
Cites
40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court· 1993-04-26· cited 16,571×
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-03-08· cited 14,756×
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-06-10· cited 7,845×
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 2,882×
- Russell v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-05-21· cited 1,715×
- United States v. GagnonSupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,062×
- Rushen v. SpainSupreme Court· 1983-12-12· cited 1,013×
- Gomez v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 981×
- Bollenbach v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1946-01-28· cited 949×
- United States v. MooreD.C. Circuit· 2011-07-29· cited 183×
- United States v. Bruce A. Beckman, United States of America v. Thomas KellyEighth Circuit· 2000-08-02· cited 159×
- United States v. James and MallaySecond Circuit· 2013-03-28· cited 147×
- Ivory v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1977-07-14· cited 109×
- United States v. William A. Widgery, Sr.Seventh Circuit· 1985-11-25· cited 77×
- United States v. James McCoyD.C. Circuit· 1970-06-19· cited 76×
- Winestock v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1981-04-01· cited 76×
- United States v. Miguel Nunez (88-2089) and Ernesto Rodriguez (88-2090)Sixth Circuit· 1989-11-22· cited 74×
- Oliver French, Jr. v. Kurt JonesSixth Circuit· 2003-06-11· cited 61×
- United States v. Jeremiah D. ToliverThird Circuit· 2003-06-04· cited 54×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.