Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/22/2013
Walker v. State
Citations
- 256 Or. App. 697
- 302 P.3d 469
- 2013 WL 2250587
- 2013 Ore. App. LEXIS 556
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the petitioner was not required to preserve an issue where purported error appeared for the first time in the judgment because “petitioner had no rea- son to know that [the judgment]” would include the asserted error
- “The dictates of preservation do not apply * * * where a party has no practical ability to object to the purported error before entry of judgment”
- “The dictates of preser- vation do not apply—and, hence, the ‘plain error’ construct is inapposite—where a party has no practical ability to object to the purported error before entry of judgment.”
- when a judgment fails to comply with ORS 138.640(1) as construed by Datt, “we must reverse and remand for the court to enter a judgment that includes findings complying with ORS 138.640(1)”
- when a judgment fails to comply with ORS 138.640(1), as elucidated in Datt, the judgment is “fatally deficient” in that regard and “we must reverse and remand for the court to enter a judgment that includes findings complying with ORS 138.640(1)”
- when a judgment fails to comply with ORS 138.640(1), as elucidated in Datt, the judgment is “fatally deficient in that regard” and “we must reverse and remand for the court to enter a judgment that includes findings complying with ORS 138.640(1)”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brewer, Haselton, Tempore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Soderstrom v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-11-04· cited 9×
- Dudrov v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-11-04· cited 6×
- Myers v. BrockampCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-06-17· cited 5×
- Gonzales v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-11-04· cited 4×
- Himebaugh v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-16· cited 2×
- State v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-08-05· cited 2×
- McKeachie v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-06-03· cited 1×
- In re the Marriage of HoffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-05-24· cited 1×
- Booth and BoothCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-08-20· cited 1×
- Kulhavy v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-08-30
- State v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-02
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court· 1991-12-12· cited 1,060×
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court· 1990-09-20· cited 504×
- Peeples v. LampertOregon Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 389×
- State ex rel. Department of Human Services v. M. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-04-01· cited 58×
- Datt v. HillOregon Supreme Court· 2010-02-11· cited 51×
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2011-09-08· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.