Court of Appeals of Oregon· 9/8/2011
State v. Wilson
Citations
- 263 P.3d 1107
- 245 Or. App. 365
- 2011 Ore. App. LEXIS 1262
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that preservation was not required because the appellant had no opportunity to object to restitution award contained in judgment until it was entered
- trial court erred in imposing DUII-conviction fee in excess of the amount allowed under the pertinent statutes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Haselton, Brewer, Armstrong
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.