Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 11/1/1983
Walker v. State
Citations
- 445 So. 2d 955
- 1983 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 5247
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- witness for State in a rape prosecution could refer to a writing for purpose of refreshing his recollection without first, as condition precedent, showing that it was necessary for his recollection to be refreshed
- witness for State in a rape prosecution could refer to a writing for purpose of refreshing his recollection without first, as condition precedent, showing that it was necessary for his recollection to be refreshed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hubert Taylor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ex Parte SlatonSupreme Court of Alabama· 1996-07-12· cited 144×
- Oken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-09-17· cited 141×
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1998-09-04· cited 74×
- Germain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-10· cited 9×
- Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1991-05-17· cited 7×
- Yates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1988-10-28
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.