Skip to main content

Walker v. State

Citations

  • 636 S.E.2d 705
  • 281 Ga. App. 526
  • 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 2936
  • 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 1156

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ascertaining that the complaint was “clearly in rem” because it named the truck and trailer as defendants in rem and referenced the appellant only as an owner of the items
  • ascertaining that the complaint was “clearly in rem” because it named the truck and trailer as defendants in rem and referenced the appellant only as an owner of the items
  • explaining further that the in rem defendant is the property, not the property owner, who could only be described as negligent in allowing his property to become involved in the offense
  • in in rem forfeiture, property is the “offender” and nothing suggests personal liability of owner
  • in in rem forfeiture, property is the \offender\ and nothing suggests personal liability of owner

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackburn, Mikell, Adams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.