Supreme Court of Georgia· 6/15/2009
Cisco v. State
Citations
- 680 S.E.2d 831
- 285 Ga. 656
- 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2024
- 58 A.L.R. 6th 809
- 2009 Ga. LEXIS 317
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- civil in personam provisions of the RICO statute are unconstitutional
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hunstein, Carley, Melton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Patel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-07-05· cited 19×
- State v. SinghSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-09-10· cited 19×
- Georgia Department of Human Services, Division of Family and Children Services v. SteinerSupreme Court of Georgia· 2018-06-18· cited 16×
- Ga. Dep't of Human Servs. v. SteinerSupreme Court of Georgia· 2018-06-18· cited 15×
- Daniel Corp. v. ReedSupreme Court of Georgia· 2012-10-01· cited 13×
- Cabiness v. LambrosCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-03-29· cited 9×
- Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2011-02-28· cited 8×
- Amusement Sales, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-07-11· cited 7×
- Balbir Singh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-07-31· cited 4×
- Greater Georgia Amusements, LLC v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-05-25· cited 3×
- NORMAN Et Al. v. YEAGERCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-01-13· cited 2×
- Smith v. CiscoCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-07-13· cited 2×
- ROUNSAVILLE v. STATE of Georgia.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-05-24· cited 1×
- Greater Georgia Amusements, LLC v. State of GaCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-05-25
- Amusement Sales, Inc. v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-07-11
- Jonathan Smith v. Fairley CiscoCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-07-13
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1997-12-10· cited 1,410×
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court· 1998-06-22· cited 1,395×
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court· 1996-06-24· cited 1,314×
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,276×
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court· 1938-03-07· cited 1,233×
- United States v. James Daniel Good Real PropertySupreme Court· 1993-12-13· cited 1,133×
- Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 1,050×
- Bennis v. MichiganSupreme Court· 1996-03-18· cited 391×
- The PalmyraSupreme Court· 1827-01-15· cited 322×
- United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court· 1939-05-22· cited 309×
- Florida v. WhiteSupreme Court· 1999-05-17· cited 188×
- Chancey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1986-11-13· cited 154×
- United States v. One 1976 Mercedes Benz 280S, Serial No. 11602012072193Seventh Circuit· 1980-03-25· cited 91×
- Pimper v. State Ex Rel. SimpsonSupreme Court of Georgia· 2001-11-19· cited 32×
- United States v. VeonE.D. California· 1982-04-29· cited 27×
- Bryan v. Georgia Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Georgia· 1977-04-05· cited 25×
- Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1996-09-23· cited 19×
- State Ex Rel. Goddard v. GravanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-02-17· cited 13×
- Walker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-09-12· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.