Walker v. BNSF Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the appellate court was not able to review the postconviction court’s determination that an Apprendi/Blakely violation was harmless where the record did not include the entire trial transcript
• “[Wjithout the entire trial transcript, we are unable to meaningfully review the trial court’s determination that the Apprendi/Blakely violation was harmless.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).