District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/13/2013
Walden v. State
Citations
- 123 So. 3d 1164
- 2013 WL 950237
- 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3957
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Absent a contemporaneous objection, an appellate court reviews a judge’s improper comment for fundamental error.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ciklin, Levine, Warner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Rimmer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-07-03· cited 92×
- Ross v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1980-06-12· cited 65×
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1992-12-17· cited 36×
- Mathew v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-02-26· cited 20×
- Josephs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-05-09· cited 11×
- Rutledge v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-01-21· cited 10×
- Jacques v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-10-06· cited 9×
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-01-31· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.