District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 6/22/1979
Wagshal v. Selig
Citations
- 403 A.2d 338
- 1979 D.C. App. LEXIS 407
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “‘[a] third party seeking to hold a principal on the apparent authority of the agent must show acts or statements of the principal known to the third party and on which the third party reasonably relied to his detriment.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nebeker, Yeagley, Harris
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Smith v. JenkinsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-10-13· cited 41×
- Perlstein v. WolkIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-02-17· cited 41×
- Gonzalez v. Internacional De Elevadores, S.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-01-31· cited 40×
- Dutch Point Credit Union, Inc. v. Caron Auto Works, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court· 1994-09-27· cited 18×
- Chestnut v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1987-04-29· cited 5×
- Andrews v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict of Columbia· 2011-10-18· cited 4×
- Casanova v. Marathon Corp.District of Columbia· 2010-06-01
- Casanova v. Marathon CorporationDistrict of Columbia· 2010-06-03
- Pearson v. District of Columbia Rental Housing CommissionDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-03-03
- Millet v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2025-06-13
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 2,898×
- Chicot County Drainage District v. Baxter State BankSupreme Court· 1940-01-02· cited 1,225×
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court· 1886-05-10· cited 712×
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court· 1973-04-02· cited 591×
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. HackettSupreme Court· 1913-05-05· cited 93×
- Downs v. JacobsSupreme Court of Delaware· 1970-12-04· cited 48×
- Stanton v. Lloyd Hammond Produce FarmsMichigan Supreme Court· 1977-05-06· cited 33×
- Apartment & Office Building Ass'n of Metropolitan Washington v. WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1975-07-16· cited 28×
- Reich v. Board of Fire & Police CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois· 1973-09-19· cited 26×
- Box Office Pictures, Inc. v. Board of Finance & RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1961-01-04· cited 26×
- Rustler's Steak House v. Environmental Associates, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1974-10-29· cited 16×
- Apartment & Office Building Ass'n of Metropolitan Washington v. MooreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-06-14· cited 11×
- Tel-Ads, Inc. v. Trans-Lux Playhouse, Inc.District of Columbia· 1964-07-20· cited 9×
- Bookasta v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal· 1975-03-19· cited 6×
- Taylor v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1968-09-05· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.