Wadleigh v. Newhall

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Halliburton II permits a defendant to “introduce evidence of a lack of price impact at the class certification stage to show the absence of predominance”
• applying a less conservative adjustment, Holm-Bonferroni, based on “the substantial number of comparisons” made by the expert, and citing an article explaining that the risk of finding false significance is prevalent where at least twenty to forty comparisons are tested
• the defendant bears the burden of production and persuasion as to rebutting the Basic presumption
• “Halliburton has not demonstrated that uncertainty caused the entirety of Halliburton's substantial price decline.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).