U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
426 records in the bulk data of CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
- Short name
- U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California
- Court type
- Federal appellate court
- Court start date
- 1863-01-01
- Court end date
- 1911-12-31
Most-cited opinions
Ranked by the number of later opinions citing each one, as recorded by CourtListener.
- Alpers v. City and County of San Francisco1887-09-05· cited 36×
- Consolidated Wyoming Gold Min. Co. v. Champion Min. Co.1894-08-13· cited 22×
- Blown v. United States Casualty Co.1899-08-07· cited 22×
- Cady v. Associated Colonies1902-11-03· cited 20×
- S. Anargyros v. Anargyros & Co.1911-09-11· cited 20×
- Liverpool & London & Globe Ins. v. Clunie1898-06-27· cited 19×
- Spring Valley Waterworks v. City & County of San Francisco1911-10-21· cited 18×
- National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. Walters1986-05-07· cited 18×
- Spring Valley Water Co. v. City & County of San Francisco1908-10-07· cited 17×
- President of Bowdoin College v. Merritt1893-11-27· cited 17×
- Simms v. Stanton1896-06-25· cited 17×
- President, Etc., of Bowdoin College v. Merritt1896-06-05· cited 16×
- Theller v. Hershey1898-09-29· cited 16×
- Enoch Morgan's Sons Co. v. Whittier-Coburn Co.1902-08-18· cited 15×
- Francoeur v. Newhouse1890-08-06· cited 15×
- Pokegama Sugar-Pine Lumber Co. v. Klamath River Lumber & Improvement Co.1898-04-18· cited 15×
- Waite v. City of Santa Cruz1898-09-29· cited 15×
- Wong Him v. Callahan1902-12-05· cited 14×
- Young v. Wempe1891-02-15· cited 14×
- Continental Ins. v. Board of Fire Underwriters of the Pacific1895-03-25· cited 14×
- Fife v. Whittell1900-06-11· cited 13×
- Montagu v. Pacific Bank1897-06-24· cited 13×
- Loewe v. California State Federation of Labor1905-07-01· cited 12×
- Baumgarten v. Alliance Assur. Co.1908-01-27· cited 12×
- President & Trustees of Bowdoin College v. Merritt1893-02-03· cited 12×
- Bowers v. Von Schmidt1894-07-23· cited 12×
- Argonaut Min. Co. v. Kennedy Min. & Mill. Co.1897-12-13· cited 12×
- Anderson v. Bassman1905-08-12· cited 11×
- Contra Costa Water Co. v. City of Oakland1904-06-29· cited 11×
- Carson City Gold & Silver Min. Co. v. North Star Min. Co.1896-03-16· cited 11×
- Atlantic Trust Co. v. Woodbridge Canal & Irrigation Co.1897-01-04· cited 11×
- United States v. Coal Dealers' Ass'n of California1898-01-28· cited 11×
- Herring v. Modesto Irr. Dist.1899-06-30· cited 11×
- Bates v. Carpentier1899-12-04· cited 11×
- Sanitary Reduction Works v. California Reduction Co.1899-05-25· cited 11×
- Jew Ho v. Williamson1900-06-15· cited 10×
- Bowers v. San Francisco Bridge Co.1898-12-12· cited 10×
- Crothers v. Edison Electric Co.1906-10-31· cited 9×
- Bagenas v. Southern Pac. Co.1910-08-01· cited 9×
- Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. Trent1899-01-23· cited 9×
- Dougherty v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co.1903-11-23· cited 8×
- Wehner v. Bauer1908-03-02· cited 8×
- United States v. Rickey Land & Cattle Co.1908-06-26· cited 8×
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. Sailors' Union of Pacific1909-01-20· cited 8×
- Beswick v. Dorris1909-12-02· cited 8×
- San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Stanislaus County1911-09-18· cited 8×
- National Fertilizer Co. v. Lambert1891-12-07· cited 8×
- Southern Pac. R. v. Goodrich1893-05-22· cited 8×
- Norton v. Agle Automatic Can Co.1893-08-16· cited 8×
- In re Grace1896-06-15· cited 8×
Most recent records
Newest filing dates first.
- Moller v. Astrue2012-06-26
- National Ass'n of Radiation Survivors v. Walters1986-05-07
- In re Lind1911-12-01
- Breard v. Lee1911-11-21
- Schmeiser Mfg. Co. v. Blanchard1911-11-10
- Spring Valley Waterworks v. City & County of San Francisco1911-10-21
- Moss & Co. v. McCarthy1911-09-27
- San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Stanislaus County1911-09-18
- S. Anargyros v. Anargyros & Co.1911-09-11
- O'Connell v. American Fire Ins.1911-08-24
- San Francisco Gas & Electric Co. v. City of San Francisco1911-08-07
- Doak v. Mammoth Copper Mining Co. of Maine1911-05-15
- Doble v. Pelton Water Wheel Co.1910-12-30
- Blackwell v. Southern Pac. Co.1910-12-19
- In re Godlover1910-09-20
- Bagenas v. Southern Pac. Co.1910-08-01
- Beryle v. San Francisco Cornice Co.1910-07-22
- United Railroads of San Francisco v. City of San Francisco1910-07-18
- Foreign Mines Development Co. v. Boyes1910-07-11
- Ralph Brown Co. v. Norwich Union Fire Ins. Soc.1910-06-27
- Galeotti v. Diamond Match Co.1910-04-11
- Beswick v. Dorris1909-12-02
- Huff v. Union Nat. Bank of Oakland1909-09-24
- United States v. Quong Lee & Co.1909-08-06
- James de Fremery & Co. v. United States1909-04-13
- Frank v. Leopold & Feron Co.1909-03-29
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. Sailors' Union of Pacific1909-01-20
- San Francisco Gas & Electric Co. v. City & County of San Franciso1908-10-26
- City of Oroville v. Indiana Gold-Dredging Co.1908-10-20
- Spring Valley Water Co. v. City & County of San Francisco1908-10-07
- United States v. Rickey Land & Cattle Co.1908-06-26
- United States v. Casterlin1908-06-26
- Vowinckel v. Clark1908-06-15
- Grand Trunk Western Ry. Co. v. Curry1908-06-15
- Western Sugar Refining Co. v. Helvetia Swiss Fire Ins.1908-06-08
- Oroville & N. R. v. Leggett1908-05-21
- Oro Water, Light & Power Co. v. City of Oroville1908-04-14
- Wehner v. Bauer1908-03-02
- In re Polsson1908-02-27
- Santa Clara County v. Goldy Machine Co.1908-02-21
- Board of Education v. Alliance Assur. Co.1908-02-03
- Baumgarten v. Alliance Assur. Co.1908-01-27
- Richmond Coal Co. v. Commercial Union Assur. Co.1908-01-24
- Marten v. Holbrook1907-12-09
- San Francisco Savings Union v. Western Assur. Co.1907-12-02
- Koike v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.1907-12-02
- United States v. Southern Pac. R. Co.1907-10-28
- Nome Beach Lighterage & Transp. Co. v. Standard Marine Ins.1907-10-04
- City of Sacramento v. Southern Pac. Co.1907-09-03
- Baker & Hamilton v. Williamsburgh City Fire Ins.1907-08-29
All courts · Full opinion archive
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.