Wade v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding admission of tape-recorded conversation with an informant for the defendant's statements, not the informant's
• upholding admission of tape-recorded conversation with an informant for the defendant’s statements, not the informant’s
• finding no Brady violation where the State OF NEVADA 3 (01 I)47A 4.424t9 - did not possess a file within the control of the DEA and the DEA \did not act as an agent of the State prosecution\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Fields v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2009-12-10· cited 21×
• Wade v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1999-10-11· cited 9×
• CARROLL (DEANGELO) VS. STATE
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2016-04-07
• Ford (Charles) Vs. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2021-10-18