Skip to main content

Fields v. State

Citations

  • 220 P.3d 709
  • 125 Nev. 785
  • 125 Nev. Adv. Rep. 58
  • 2009 Nev. LEXIS 73

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that warnings that a jail conversation will be recorded defeats the expectation of confidentiality
  • holding that statements made during jailhouse calls between a husband and wife that they knew were recorded did not have the required expectation of confidentiality for the marital privilege to apply
  • explaining that a defendant's \knowing participation in prior bad acts with\ coconspirators may be used to refute the defendant's claim that he was an unwitting or innocent bystander to the crime
  • explaining that a defendant's \knowing participation in prior bad acts with\ coconspirators may be used to refute the defendant's claim that he was an unwitting or innocent bystander to the crime
  • reviewing a district court's determination as to a hearsay exception for an abuse of discretion
  • reviewing district SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 3 (0) 1947A ailli311. court's hearsay determination for abuse of discretion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pickering, Hardesty, Parraguirre, Douglas, Gibbons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.