Skip to main content
· 8/29/2007

Wade v. Soo Line RR Corp.

Citations

  • 500 F.3d 559
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20617
  • 2007 WL 2429481

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • withholding of highly relevant “smoking gun” documents justified dismissal with prejudice and the assessment of fees and costs
  • ordering plaintiff’s at- torney to show cause why he should not be disciplined for deliberately concealing documents
  • ordering plaintiff’s at- torney to show cause why he should not be disciplined for deliberately concealing documents
  • ordering plaintiff’s at- torney to show cause why he should not be disciplined for deliberately concealing documents
  • ordering plaintiff’s at- torney to show cause why he should not be disciplined for deliberately concealing documents
  • “We doubt that ‘clear and convincing’ evidence is required” to establish a wilful violation of Rule 37

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Bauer, Manion

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.