Supreme Court of Georgia· 9/7/1983
Vulcan Materials Co. v. Driltech, Inc.
Citations
- 306 S.E.2d 253
- 251 Ga. 383
- 1983 Ga. LEXIS 808
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the rule applies \when a defective product has resulted in the loss of the value or use of the thing sold\
- stating that the rule applies \when a defective product has resulted in the loss of the value or use of the thing sold\
- holding that “[a]n ‘accident’ should be defined as a sudden and calamitous event which, although it may only cause damage to the defective product itself, poses an unreasonable risk of injury to other persons or property”
- noting, in the context of product manufacturers, that the law imposes a duty on such manufacturers “to produce safe items, regardless of whether the ultimate impact of the hazard is on people, other property, or the product itself” (punctuation and emphasis omitted)
- damages for economic loss associated with defective product recoverable in tort only if there is personal injury or damage to property other than the defective product itself
- ruptured hydraulic system started fire that engulfed machine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marshall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Indemnity Ins. Co. v. American AviationSupreme Court of Florida· 2004-12-23· cited 138×
- Presnell Construction Managers, Inc. v. EH Construction, LLCKentucky Supreme Court· 2004-05-20· cited 137×
- Bocre Leasing Corp. v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals· 1995-01-10· cited 77×
- Trans States Airlines v. Pratt & Whitney Canada, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court· 1997-06-19· cited 76×
- Ritter v. Custom Chemicides, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1995-12-18· cited 65×
- Sharp Bros. Contracting Co. v. American Hoist & Derrick Co.Supreme Court of Missouri· 1986-01-15· cited 59×
- Continental Insurance v. Page Engineering Co.Wyoming Supreme Court· 1989-12-05· cited 58×
- General Electric Co. v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia· 2005-02-07· cited 43×
- Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. Wabash National Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-02-27· cited 37×
- Pycsa Panama, S.A. v. Tensar Earth Technologies, Inc.S.D. Florida· 2008-04-16· cited 32×
- Lincoln General Insurance Co. v. Detroit Diesel Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2009-08-21· cited 28×
- Sanco, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., Sanco, Inc., Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee v. Ford Motor Co., Defendant-Cross-AppellantSeventh Circuit· 1985-08-29· cited 25×
- Advanced Drainage Systems, Inc. v. LowmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-09-10· cited 23×
- Bates & Associates, Inc. v. RomeiCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-01-13· cited 20×
- Sanco, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.S.D. Indiana· 1984-02-13· cited 20×
- Busbee v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1999-11-03· cited 17×
- Squish La Fish, Inc. v. Thomco Specialty Products, Inc.Eleventh Circuit· 1998-08-11· cited 13×
- City of Cairo v. Hightower Consulting Engineers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-03-28· cited 8×
- Edwards v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-10-14· cited 7×
- Sofet v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-12-17· cited 7×
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court· 1965-06-23· cited 667×
- Long v. Jim Letts Oldsmobile, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1975-06-11· cited 73×
- Cloud v. Kit Manufacturing Co.Alaska Supreme Court· 1977-04-29· cited 65×
- Long Manufacturing, N. C., Inc. v. Grady Tractor Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1976-10-25· cited 20×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.