Vroman v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• claimant must “exercise the full rights of owner”; deed executed to claimant was irrelevant because the deed didn’t carry with it a right of action for compensation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lacey v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1979-03-21· cited 46×
• Martin v. United States
  Federal Claims· 1994-01-28· cited 25×
• Sally Saunders Toles, Elyse Saunders Patterson and Sue Saunders Graham v. United States
  Tenth Circuit· 1967-01-11· cited 20×
• Bailey v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2007-08-10· cited 13×
• Bailey v. United States
  Federal Claims· 2014-05-29

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Dow
  Supreme Court· 1958-06-09· cited 400×
• Highland Park, Inc. v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1958-05-07· cited 28×
• Berry v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1954-11-30· cited 6×

Other cases named Vroman v. United States

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Vroman v. United States
  Court of Claims· 1959-10-07· cited 4×
• Vroman v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1993-03-22
• Vroman v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1993-03-22